Volume 53, Issue 5 p. 405-415
Original Article

Men In and Out of Treatment for Depression: Strategies for Improved Engagement

Zac E. Seidler

Corresponding Author

Zac E. Seidler

School of Psychology, The University of Sydney

Correspondence: Zac E. Seidler, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Level 6 (North), Lifehouse, 119-143 Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Simon M. Rice

Simon M. Rice

Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne

Search for more papers by this author
John L. Oliffe

John L. Oliffe

School of Nursing, University of British Columbia

Search for more papers by this author
Andrea S. Fogarty

Andrea S. Fogarty

Blackdog Institute, The University of New South Wales

Search for more papers by this author
Haryana M. Dhillon

Haryana M. Dhillon

Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, The University of Sydney

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 October 2017
Citations: 65
As a cross-institutional and cross-continental research team, the authors of this manuscript make up a unique mix of early, mid-career and long-time leading experts in the men's mental health field. This team was responsible for the first systematic review of the area and continues aiming for rigorous, innovative empirical contributions.

Abstract

Objective

While the prevalence of major depressive disorder continues to rise, many men are reticent to seek and sustain psychotherapy. The current study explored Australian men's experiences with treatment for depression with a view to guiding recommendations for improving treatment engagement.

Method

Twenty men (23–64 years) who had received psychotherapy for depressive symptoms in the past 3 years took part in individual, semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded in line with interpretive descriptive methodologies.

Results

Findings suggested men's preference for a transparent orientation to treatment, including the provision of a clear structure for therapy. Men's preferred structure included focusing on individualised goals and expected progress, establishment of trust, and a sharing of decisional control. Providing an action-oriented functional treatment with targeted skills attainment was recommended as most engaging. The focus on “doing” in treatment, as distinct from pure talk therapy, engendered feelings of strength and empowerment in the men, bridging self-management of symptoms and wellness. Most participants, however, did not receive a treatment style that properly engaged them, and articulated clear recommendations for changes needed.

Conclusions

Findings highlight the potential for development and dissemination of gender sensitive, strength-based clinical training and treatment options for better engaging men in psychotherapy for depression.